万条推文“怒轰”、估值下跌， OpenAI被误导性“突破”反噬，陶哲轩：有实力，但方向错了？

Core Viewpoint - The recent claims by OpenAI researchers regarding a breakthrough with GPT-5 in solving Erdős problems have been retracted, leading to criticism from the AI community and raising questions about the integrity of OpenAI's communications [2][6][7]. Group 1: Incident Background - OpenAI researchers initially celebrated a supposed breakthrough with GPT-5, claiming it solved 10 previously unsolved Erdős problems, but this claim was quickly challenged and retracted [2][3][4]. - The announcement originated from Sebastien Bubeck, a former Microsoft VP, who later acknowledged that GPT-5 merely found existing literature on the problems rather than generating independent solutions [3][6]. Group 2: Community Reaction - The AI community reacted negatively, with hashtags like "OpenAIFail" trending on social media, reflecting disappointment and skepticism towards OpenAI's claims [7]. - The incident has led to a significant drop in OpenAI's stock-linked valuation indicators during pre-market trading [7]. Group 3: Regulatory Scrutiny - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has begun investigating OpenAI for potential false advertising, which could result in fines or other penalties [7]. - Lawmakers are calling for increased transparency in AI research to prevent exaggerated claims that could undermine public trust in the technology [7]. Group 4: AI's Practical Value in Research - Despite the misleading claims, GPT-5 demonstrated practical value as a research tool for tracking academic papers, particularly in fields with scattered literature [8][10]. - Terence Tao, a prominent mathematician, emphasized that AI's most effective application in mathematics is not in solving the hardest problems but in accelerating and scaling routine research tasks [8][12]. Group 5: Literature Review Benefits - AI can enhance literature reviews by systematically searching for relevant papers, providing both positive and negative results, which can lead to a more accurate representation of existing research [11][12]. - The ability to report both found and unfound literature can help prevent redundant efforts by researchers and clarify the status of unresolved problems [11][12].