见虚拟货币东方迟迟不上钩无，美高层被逼提前“撕破脸”！

Group 1 - The recent seizure of $15 billion in Bitcoin held by a Cambodian group by U.S. authorities has sparked widespread controversy, raising questions about the legitimacy of such regulatory actions and the inherent vulnerabilities of cryptocurrencies in the face of power [1] - The value of virtual currencies is highly dependent on stable environments; in times of war, credit collapse, or hyperinflation, tangible assets like cash, gold, and food are considered true "hard currencies" [3] - Historical energy shortages could lead to localized conflicts, while crises in food and water sources may undermine societal foundations, highlighting the fragility of virtual assets when survival is threatened [3] Group 2 - Ten years ago, certain regions enacted legislation to restrict virtual currency trading, effectively mitigating risks associated with such assets [4] - Some countries that previously promoted the "anonymity" and "untraceability" of Bitcoin are now under debt pressure and are attempting to reclaim assets, signaling a warning to global investors about the risks of virtual assets detached from tangible support [6]