李睿：从模拟谈判实践看如何“走出去”

Core Insights - Deep-sea mining has emerged as a contentious global issue, balancing economic interests, environmental risks, and international regulatory frameworks [1][2] - The International Seabed Authority (ISA) faces pressure from resource-demanding nations and multinational corporations while addressing ecological concerns from island nations and environmental organizations [1][2] - The negotiation process highlights the need for vulnerable countries to leverage moral discourse and alliance strategies to gain relative advantages in international negotiations [1] Group 1: International Negotiation Dynamics - International negotiations seek to balance diverse interests, with countries prioritizing their benefits based on technological investment, resource endowment, and environmental vulnerability [2] - Global governance issues, such as deep-sea mining, require major powers to balance development and responsibility, proposing fair and sustainable institutional arrangements [2] - Informal interactions during negotiations can be crucial for breaking deadlocks, emphasizing the importance of flexibility between formal and informal communication [2] Group 2: Capacity Building for Negotiation - There is a need to enhance the framework and skill set for international negotiations, applicable to various Chinese entities facing complex issues [3] - Understanding cultural differences through field engagement is essential for identifying common ground and avoiding misunderstandings in negotiations [3] - A mechanism for cultivating composite negotiation talents is necessary, with a focus on interdisciplinary training and practical simulation platforms in Chinese higher education [3] Group 3: China's Role in Global Governance - China must uphold core interests while addressing global concerns, demonstrating responsible great power behavior [4] - Enhancing negotiation capabilities across government, enterprises, think tanks, and social organizations is vital for establishing a multi-layered foreign exchange network [4] - This approach will enable China to maintain its bottom line and gain more initiative in complex international negotiations [4]