江宇舟：反击美国制裁，我们做得怎样？为什么会是一场持久战？

Core Points - The article discusses the recent escalation of tensions between China and the U.S. following the Madrid economic talks, highlighting the rapid implementation of U.S. measures against China and China's subsequent countermeasures. [1][2] - It emphasizes that the current conflict is not a result of misjudgment but a clear understanding of interests from both sides, with China prepared to defend its position against U.S. unilateral actions. [1][2] Group 1 - The U.S. has introduced 20 measures against China in just over 20 days, including export control lists that affect thousands of Chinese companies and new port fees for Chinese shipbuilding. [2][3] - China's countermeasures are coordinated across multiple departments, indicating a structured response framework that includes actions like rare earth export controls and investigations into U.S. companies. [3][4] - The article notes that while the number of countermeasures is fewer than in April, they continue to follow a similar framework, targeting the entire rare earth supply chain and involving antitrust investigations. [3][6] Group 2 - The countermeasures are described as more precise, reflecting U.S. regulatory practices, such as stringent approval processes for products containing rare earth elements. [6][7] - The article highlights the strategic nature of these measures, which not only respond to U.S. actions but also set new rules and standards that could impact U.S. companies operating in China. [6][7] - China's response also extends to foreign companies that support U.S. actions, signaling a broader strategy to deter collaboration with the U.S. against Chinese interests. [8][9] Group 3 - The article suggests that the current U.S. administration's chaotic approach to trade and sanctions has created opportunities for China to assert its position more effectively. [9][10] - It points out that the U.S. is struggling to formulate a coherent counter-strategy, leading to a perception of disarray within the U.S. government. [10][13] - The ongoing tensions are framed as part of a larger, long-term struggle against U.S. hegemony, with China needing to prepare for a sustained conflict. [15][19] Group 4 - The article concludes with a call for China to enhance its counter-sanction capabilities, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive legal framework and better coordination among various government departments. [26][28] - It advocates for the development of a robust response system that can effectively address the challenges posed by U.S. sanctions and trade measures. [26][30] - The need for a strategic approach to international relations and trade is underscored, with an emphasis on building alliances and enhancing China's global economic presence. [34][36]