24小时内，特朗普遭三重打击：印度装傻，中国强硬，俄找到美破绽

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements by Trump regarding India's cessation of Russian oil purchases and similar demands on China have been met with resistance from both countries, indicating a complex geopolitical landscape in the energy sector [1][3][5]. Group 1: India's Response - India's Ministry of External Affairs did not confirm Trump's claims, emphasizing that its energy decisions prioritize domestic consumer interests [3]. - India's Trade Secretary revealed that there is potential for increasing oil purchases from the U.S. by $14 to $15 billion, but this is contingent on significant price reductions from the U.S. [3][4]. - The increase in Russian oil imports by India has surged from less than 1% to approximately 35% since the onset of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, highlighting the economic rationale behind this shift [4]. Group 2: China's Position - China firmly rejected Trump's demands, asserting that its energy cooperation with Russia is legitimate and part of normal trade practices [3][4]. - The Chinese government criticized the U.S. approach as unilateral bullying and economic coercion, reflecting a broader geopolitical tension [3][7]. - Unlike India, China maintains the ability to make independent decisions based on national interests, allowing it to resist U.S. pressure effectively [9]. Group 3: Russia's Stance - Russia's response to U.S. pressure has been calm, with officials stating that they will continue to cooperate with friendly nations and emphasizing the competitive advantage of Russian energy in the global market [4][5]. - The Russian oil market has seen increased demand, particularly from India, due to lower prices compared to alternatives, which the U.S. struggles to match [4]. Group 4: Broader Geopolitical Implications - The interactions between the U.S., India, China, and Russia reflect a complex geopolitical struggle, with the U.S. attempting to cut off Russian energy revenues while promoting its own energy exports [5][7]. - The situation illustrates the shifting dynamics in global energy markets, where unilateral U.S. dominance appears to be waning [9].