新车拆出“隐藏盲盒”？小米YU7新车竟藏“不明零件”

Core Viewpoint - The recent quality issue with the Xiaomi YU7 vehicle, highlighted by a car owner, has raised significant concerns regarding the company's quality control and accountability in the automotive sector [1][5][15]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The car owner discovered a raised floor and an unidentified extra part under the driver's side after only two days of ownership, prompting a request for a formal inspection report from Xiaomi, which was not provided [5][8]. - The owner expressed a desire for transparency regarding the safety implications of the raised floor and the origin of the extra part, emphasizing consumer rights to know the truth about production quality [8][14]. Group 2: Public Reaction - The incident has sparked polarized reactions online, with some users questioning Xiaomi's manufacturing quality and others expressing concerns about vehicle safety due to potential structural issues [10][16]. - Other Xiaomi car owners have reported similar issues, creating a sense of solidarity among consumers facing quality concerns [10]. Group 3: Historical Context - Previous complaints about Xiaomi vehicles, including issues with battery packs and miscommunication during the sales process, have contributed to a growing reputation for quality disputes [11][15]. - The company has faced scrutiny over its sales practices, with reports of pressure on customers to accept vehicles quickly, often with visible defects [11][15]. Group 4: Expert Analysis - Industry experts have indicated that the presence of an unidentified part suggests potential lapses in quality management during production, which is particularly concerning in the automotive industry where every component should be traceable [14][17]. - Legal experts have noted that consumers have the right to demand complete information regarding vehicle quality, especially concerning safety-related issues [14]. Group 5: Ongoing Developments - As of the latest updates, Xiaomi has not publicly responded to the incident, and the car owner has indicated intentions to pursue legal action for resolution [15][17].