未来5年后，楼梯房和电梯房哪一个更值钱？其实答案很明显

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the advantages of "staircase houses" over "elevator houses" in the context of the current real estate market in China, highlighting factors such as cost-effectiveness, safety, potential for demolition compensation, and convenience of daily commuting. Group 1: Cost-Effectiveness - "Staircase houses" have a higher usable area compared to "elevator houses," leading to lower overall costs for buyers. For instance, a 100 square meter "elevator house" may only provide around 75 square meters of usable space, while a "staircase house" can offer approximately 85 square meters, resulting in significant savings on shared costs [2]. Group 2: Safety - "Staircase houses" are considered safer in emergencies, as residents can quickly evacuate via stairs during incidents like earthquakes or fires, unlike "elevator houses," where elevators may fail, complicating escape and rescue efforts [3]. Group 3: Demolition Potential - "Staircase houses" typically have fewer residents and lower demolition costs, making them more likely candidates for urban renewal projects. In contrast, "elevator houses" often involve higher costs due to the larger number of residents, reducing the likelihood of demolition opportunities for owners [3]. Group 4: Daily Commuting Convenience - "Staircase houses" avoid the inconveniences associated with "elevator houses," such as long wait times for elevators during peak hours or the burden of using stairs when elevators are under maintenance. This can be particularly challenging for residents of high-rise "elevator houses" [5]. Group 5: Overall Investment Value - Considering factors like cost-effectiveness, safety, demolition potential, and commuting convenience, "staircase houses" may present a more attractive investment opportunity over the next five years, although final decisions should align with individual preferences and needs [5].