被印度公司坑了？苏丹红事件真相

Core Viewpoint - The discovery of Sudan IV, a banned synthetic dye, in cosmetic products has sparked consumer panic and raised questions about product safety and regulatory compliance in the cosmetics industry [6][8][24]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A third-party testing agency, "Old Dad Testing," reported the presence of Sudan IV in a skin care product, leading to widespread consumer concern and discussions on social media [6][8]. - Sudan IV has been banned in cosmetics in China since 2007 due to its potential carcinogenic effects [8][9]. Group 2: Source of Contamination - The contamination was traced back to three specific raw materials: Eclipta Prostrata extract, Melia Azadirachta leaf extract, and Moringa Oleifera seed oil, with a high concentration of 1170 ppm detected [9][12]. - The supplier of the contaminated raw materials is identified as Campo Research (S) Pte. Ltd., a company based in Singapore but linked to India, raising concerns about the sourcing and quality control of cosmetic ingredients [9][13]. Group 3: Industry Response and Consumer Impact - Over 400 cosmetic brands are potentially affected, leading to a crisis of trust among consumers regarding product safety [9][24]. - Brands have stated that their products passed regulatory inspections, but they are now sending affected products for further testing [22][28]. Group 4: Regulatory and Safety Considerations - Experts emphasize the need for thorough safety assessments of detected substances, as the current findings do not automatically equate to health risks [21][28]. - The incident highlights the importance of transparency in ingredient sourcing and the need for stricter regulatory measures to prevent the introduction of banned substances into cosmetic products [27][28].