南昌大学无需为“低俗招聘”道歉，一窝蜂考编不比主播高贵

Core Viewpoint - The incident at Nanchang University highlights the tension between traditional views of education and the evolving job market, particularly regarding the acceptance of non-traditional roles like live streaming and content creation in prestigious academic settings [1][2][3] Group 1: Education and Employment Landscape - The value of degrees is diminishing, with an increasing number of master's and doctoral graduates compared to undergraduates, raising questions about the continued prestige of 211 universities [2][3] - The expansion of higher education since 1999 has led to a significant increase in the number of graduates, diluting the perceived value of degrees [3][6] - In emerging fields such as content creation and live streaming, skills and personal capabilities are becoming more important than formal educational qualifications [3][6] Group 2: Perception of Professions - There exists a societal hierarchy that values public sector jobs over private sector roles, with a prevailing belief that government jobs are more respectable [4][5] - The perception of live streaming as a less legitimate profession compared to traditional roles is challenged, as both require professional skills and competencies [7][8] - The notion that live streaming is inherently less respectable than public sector jobs is critiqued, emphasizing that many public sector roles may involve unfulfilling tasks and bureaucratic inefficiencies [9] Group 3: Market Realities - Nanchang University's decision to allow a live streaming company to participate in their job fair reflects a pragmatic approach to the diverse employment needs of graduates in a changing economy [6] - The increasing acceptance of various job types, including those in the gig economy, indicates a shift towards recognizing the legitimacy of different career paths [6][8]