从“一水共护”迈向“一域共富”

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing a market-oriented and diversified ecological protection compensation mechanism to bridge the gap between ecological preservation and economic development, particularly in the context of the Jinjiang and Luoyang River upstream water resource protection compensation mechanism [2][3][4]. Group 1: Systematic Enhancement of Ecological Compensation - The core goal of watershed ecological compensation is to quantify the consensus level among compensation subjects, reflecting the depth and stability of ecological protection awareness [3]. - A well-defined initial goal that aligns with urban development needs indicates a strong motivation for the synergy between ecological protection and economic development [3]. - The compensation mechanism aims to balance development between ecological protection areas and beneficiary regions, promoting coordinated reforms in ecological resource protection, environmental governance, and ecological rights trading [3]. Group 2: Diversification of Ecological Compensation - A diversified ecological compensation mechanism relies on various compensation subjects sharing a common compensation burden, creating a multi-channel and efficient compensation system [4]. - This approach enhances public recognition and acceptance of ecological compensation, transitioning from "single water quality governance" to "shared prosperity in watershed development" [4]. - The mechanism categorizes compensation subjects into government, market entities, and social organizations, fostering collaboration and enhancing public awareness of ecological compensation [4]. Group 3: Synergistic Expansion of Ecological Compensation - The article discusses the need to break down regional and sectoral barriers to create a deep integration of ecological protection and economic development [4][5]. - A multi-faceted compensation framework is proposed, linking provincial, municipal, and county levels, and facilitating cross-regional cooperation between protected and beneficiary areas [4]. - The use of diverse green financial tools is suggested to address funding challenges in ecological protection compensation, establishing a market-oriented channel for converting governance costs into industrial premiums [4]. Group 4: Institutional Support for Ecological Products - The government is encouraged to leverage local legislative powers to create a differentiated regulatory framework that aligns ecological development needs with ecological product industries [5]. - The article highlights the importance of clearly defining principles, scope, subjects, and standards for watershed ecological compensation to provide institutional support for ecological protection initiatives [5]. - It suggests incorporating multiple compensation factors based on various environmental characteristics, such as pollution types, river sizes, and biodiversity [5].