美国霸权遭华精准反击!稀土管控后,美国登月项目要靠中国技术
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-10-23 11:19

Group 1 - The trade war has evolved beyond a traditional trade dispute, showcasing absurdities and complexities that impact global supply chains [1][3][40] - The EU and allies like Japan and South Korea are suffering significant consequences for aligning with U.S. policies, becoming "sandwiched" between competing interests [3][5][11] - The EU's reliance on rare earth materials, with 98% sourced from a single supplier, poses a critical risk to its green transition goals and industrial capabilities [5][9][35] Group 2 - The recent sanctions and trade restrictions have led to immediate repercussions in the shipping and automotive sectors, with European companies facing increased operational costs and supply chain disruptions [7][11][25] - The semiconductor industry is particularly vulnerable, as companies like ASML depend heavily on rare earth materials, highlighting the interconnectedness of global supply chains [39][40] - The U.S. aerospace sector, especially Boeing, is experiencing severe impacts due to the trade war, with a significant loss of market share in China and reliance on rare earths for production [25][27][40] Group 3 - The trade war has revealed the fragility of supply chains, with critical materials for pharmaceuticals and technology being sourced from single suppliers, raising concerns about future availability [27][31][39] - The narrative of U.S. dominance through sanctions and tariffs is challenged by the reality of economic losses and market volatility, as evidenced by the $2 trillion drop in U.S. stock market value [21][42] - The focus on "prayer" and ideological governance by U.S. politicians contrasts sharply with the tangible realities of industrial dependencies and supply chain vulnerabilities faced by allied nations [14][42]