欧洲头条丨布达佩斯峰会“搁置” 美俄欧继续博弈

Core Viewpoint - The planned meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin in Budapest has faced multiple reversals, with the US now stating that the meeting is "not appropriate" and imposing sanctions on two major Russian oil companies, reflecting the complex interplay of interests among the US, Russia, Ukraine, Hungary, and the EU [2][4][6] Group 1: US Position - President Trump canceled the Budapest meeting, citing an inability to achieve expected goals, but left the door open for future engagement with Russia [4] - Trump's recent discussions with Ukrainian President Zelensky involved pressure on Ukraine regarding territorial compromises, which were rejected, leading to a breakdown in talks [4] - The lack of progress in talks between US Secretary of State Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov has contributed to the decision to postpone the meeting [6] Group 2: EU's Complex Stance - The EU's internal attitude towards the Budapest summit is mixed, as Hungary's participation as an EU and NATO member complicates the EU's stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict [9][10] - Hungary's long-standing opposition to military aid for Ukraine and its resistance to EU sanctions against Russia have led to tensions within the EU, with some members considering actions against Hungary's voting rights [10] - EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Borrell, expressed dissatisfaction with the idea of hosting such talks in Budapest, questioning their potential effectiveness [12] Group 3: Hungary's Optimism - Despite the US's changing stance, Hungary remains optimistic about hosting the summit, emphasizing Budapest's unique position as a potential meeting place [13] - Hungarian Prime Minister Orban highlighted his long-standing relationships with both US and Russian leaders as a factor in Budapest's selection as the venue [13] - Hungarian officials assert that preparations for the summit are ongoing, countering claims of its cancellation [13][14] Group 4: Historical Context - The article reflects on historical precedents for conflict resolution, noting that the current geopolitical situation lacks clear pathways for compromise or resolution [15] - The Budapest Memorandum of 1994, which involved security assurances for Ukraine in exchange for nuclear disarmament, is cited as a significant historical event relevant to the current crisis [15]