进一步创造良好的科研环境（人民时评）

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to reform the current scientific evaluation system that overly relies on academic titles, referred to as "hats," and advocates for a more innovative and contribution-oriented approach to resource allocation in research [1][2][3]. Group 1: Current Issues in Scientific Evaluation - The term "hats" refers to various talent plans and academic titles in the scientific field, which significantly influence the distribution of research resources [1]. - There is a growing concern among researchers about the pressure and anxiety caused by the competition for "hats," which detracts from genuine scientific inquiry [1][3]. Group 2: Government and Institutional Responses - The government has recognized the issue by including "hat governance" in this year's work report, indicating a commitment to curbing the trend of prioritizing titles over actual contributions [2]. - The National Natural Science Foundation has eliminated terms like "杰青" and "优青," reflecting a clear stance on diminishing the importance of "hats" [2]. Group 3: Proposed Solutions for Improvement - To create a better research environment, it is essential to abandon the "hat-based" evaluation mechanism and return to recognizing academic honors based on merit [3]. - Institutions like Tsinghua University have initiated projects that support researchers without considering their titles, allowing them to focus on significant scientific contributions [3]. - A more nuanced evaluation system should be established, tailored to different roles and disciplines, emphasizing innovation and actual contributions [3][4]. Group 4: Future Directions for Evaluation Standards - The new evaluation standards should be diverse, scientifically sound, operationally feasible, and fair, with an emphasis on peer review and clear criteria for assessing significant contributions [4]. - The article advocates for a scientific talent evaluation system that fosters efficient resource flow, fair competition, and vibrant innovation, ensuring that every researcher can maintain their original aspirations [4].