摒弃“以帽取人”的科研评价机制

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the negative impact of the "hat" system, which refers to various talent plans and academic titles in the scientific research field, on the allocation of research resources and the academic environment [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with the "Hat" System - The "hat" system creates significant disparities in research resource allocation, leading to a focus on titles rather than actual talent and development suitability [1]. - The binding of "hats" to job titles, awards, and recruitment processes has resulted in a distorted academic ecosystem, fostering a culture of immediate results and undermining the true value of scientific research [1][2]. Group 2: Proposed Reforms - The government has recognized the need to address the "hat" issue, as indicated in this year's government work report, which emphasizes the reform of talent evaluation and the governance of the "hat" system [1]. - Institutions like Tsinghua University are implementing initiatives that support basic research without considering titles, allowing researchers to focus on significant scientific contributions [2]. Group 3: New Evaluation Mechanisms - A new evaluation system should be established that prioritizes innovation value and actual contributions, tailored to different roles and disciplines [2][3]. - The article advocates for a diversified evaluation standard that ensures scientific, operable, and fair new rules, including expanded peer review and clear definitions of significant contributions [3]. Group 4: Vision for the Future - The goal is to create a healthier academic ecosystem that promotes efficient resource flow, fair talent competition, and vibrant innovation, allowing researchers to maintain their original intentions and ensuring that resources are directed towards valuable scientific research [3].