ST路通控制权争夺白热化：吴世春提名被拒，股东大会前“超长期”质押大批持股

Core Points - The control battle between Wu Shichun, the founding partner of Meihua Venture Capital, and the current management of ST Luton has intensified, with Wu's board nominations being repeatedly rejected by the board [2][3] - Wu Shichun pledged 75% of his shares in the company, which accounts for 7.85% of the total share capital, with an unusual pledge expiration date set to 9999-01-01, indicating a strategic move to mitigate risks and maintain influence despite losing board seats [2][8] Group 1: Board Dynamics - Wu Shichun's nominations for two non-independent directors were rejected by the board, while the nominations from the third-largest shareholder, Wu Aijun, were approved unanimously [3][4] - The board's rejection of Wu's nominees was based on concerns regarding their qualifications and past performance, highlighting a significant divide in the board's opinions [4][5] - This marks the second time in 2023 that Wu Shichun has faced setbacks in his board nominations, indicating a growing complexity in the control dynamics of the board [4][5] Group 2: Share Pledge and Financial Strategy - Wu Shichun's pledge of 75% of his shares is seen as a financial maneuver to reduce pressure from margin calls and to potentially fund external investments [2][8] - The pledge is characterized as a "long-term" risk mitigation tool, commonly used by major shareholders to lower financial costs and maintain voting rights [2][8] - The funds from this pledge are explicitly stated not to be used for the company's operational needs, suggesting a strategy focused on external financial maneuvers rather than internal company growth [8] Group 3: Upcoming Shareholder Meeting - The upcoming shareholder meeting is expected to be contentious, with significant discussions around the cancellation of the supervisory board and changes to the company's governance structure [2][7] - The board structure will expand from five to seven members, including three independent directors and one employee representative, reflecting a shift in governance strategy [7]