Group 1 - The UK recently expanded sanctions against Russian energy companies, including Rosneft and Lukoil, but later allowed business with two German subsidiaries of Rosneft, indicating a contradictory approach to sanctions [1][4][5] - The two subsidiaries, under German control since 2022, are crucial for Germany's energy supply, holding significant refining capacity that supplies 90% of Berlin's fuel [4][5][10] - The UK’s exemption for these companies reflects a strategic decision to avoid disrupting Germany's energy security, highlighting the complexities within European energy dependencies [5][16] Group 2 - The UK simultaneously imposed new sanctions on various entities, including four Chinese oil terminals and 44 oil tankers involved in transporting Russian oil, demonstrating a dual standard in enforcement [7][8][10] - The German arms industry, particularly Rheinmetall, has seen a significant increase in defense sales, with a projected 2024 revenue of €7.6 billion, up 50% year-over-year, indicating a booming military sector amid the conflict [10][11] - Germany's arms exports have surged, with 2024 figures expected to reach €13.33 billion, of which €8.15 billion is directed towards Ukraine, showcasing the military industry's growth during the ongoing conflict [11][12] Group 3 - Russia has criticized the sanctions as illegal and counterproductive, suggesting that they harm the implementing countries more than Russia itself [12][14] - The ongoing conflict has led to increased energy prices in Europe, with both Germany and the UK facing rising costs and economic challenges due to the sanctions [16][17] - The contradictions in Western sanctions reflect internal conflicts among European nations, balancing the need to pressure Russia while protecting their own economic interests [16][17]
英国拉黑中国4座码头,转头给俄油德国子公司开绿灯,真相扎心
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-10-24 17:15