没谈拢，安世中国强势反击，“断粮”倒计时60天，欧盟来电求饶

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the political intervention in the semiconductor industry, specifically the takeover of ASML by the Dutch government, which has intensified tensions between China and the Netherlands [1][3]. - The semiconductor dispute highlights the complexities of intertwined supply chains and the impact of political decisions on market dynamics, particularly in the automotive sector [3][9]. - The Dutch government's actions, justified by "national security," have led to significant backlash from China, which has emphasized its control over ASML's core production capabilities located in China [3][10]. Group 2 - In response to the takeover, ASML China has asserted its independence by adhering to Chinese laws and restructuring its management to reinforce local control [5][7]. - ASML China has shifted its business transactions to RMB, mitigating risks associated with currency fluctuations and enhancing financial stability amid international tensions [7]. - The European automotive industry is increasingly aware of the risks posed by potential chip supply disruptions, with warnings from manufacturers about the consequences of halted production lines [9][10]. Group 3 - The situation has prompted the EU to reconsider its stance, recognizing the critical role of China in the supply of rare earth materials and semiconductors, which are essential for various industries [11][13]. - The ongoing tensions serve as a warning to other nations about the fragility of global supply chains and the repercussions of disregarding market rules [15]. - The resolution of this conflict will significantly influence the future stability of the semiconductor market and the broader implications for international trade and cooperation [15].