NASA和登月，总得先完蛋一个，马斯克要被踢出局，急的破口大骂

Core Viewpoint - The recent proposal by U.S. Transportation Secretary and acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy to merge NASA into the Department of Transportation has sparked significant controversy, as it would downgrade NASA from an independent agency to a regular government department [1][3]. Group 1: Proposal and Implications - Duffy's rationale for the merger includes reducing bureaucracy, optimizing budget structures, and increasing efficiency, while also emphasizing the need to compete with China's advancements in space exploration [3]. - The proposal is seen as politically motivated, potentially aligning with former President Trump's interests, as Duffy's position is attributed to his connections with Trump and Fox News [3][5]. Group 2: Opposition and Concerns - There is considerable public opposition to the downgrade of NASA, with many Americans viewing the agency as a symbol of national pride and technological achievement [5]. - Elon Musk has publicly criticized Duffy's intelligence and expressed concerns that the restructuring could jeopardize SpaceX's contracts related to the Artemis lunar program, indicating potential disruptions to ongoing projects [5][7]. Group 3: Political Dynamics - The ongoing political maneuvering surrounding NASA and the lunar program is characterized as a budget game, where the narrative of competing with China is used to secure funding in Congress [7][8]. - The challenges facing NASA are attributed not to a lack of funding or technology, but rather to the constraints imposed by political interests and competing agendas within the U.S. [8].