美国终于找到了反制稀土的新办法，接连出手三招，逼中方就范！

Core Points - The ongoing US-China talks in Malaysia focus on three main issues, including China's stricter rare earth export controls, which the US fears could disrupt supply chains in critical sectors like semiconductor manufacturing and defense [3] - The US aims to pressure China into relaxing these export restrictions to ensure stable raw material supplies for industries such as electric vehicles and semiconductors [3] - The US also seeks to increase Chinese imports of agricultural products like soybeans to alleviate export barriers faced by American farmers [3] - A significant goal of these talks is to prepare for a meeting between the two countries' leaders at the upcoming APEC summit in South Korea [3] Measures Taken by the US - US Treasury Secretary Mnuchin announced that if China does not lift its rare earth controls, the US will collaborate with the G7 to impose software export restrictions on China, targeting its high-tech development [4] - The US has initiated an investigation into whether China has complied with trade agreement terms signed during Trump's first term, with potential additional sanctions if non-compliance is found [7] - Starting November 1, the US plans to impose a 100% tariff on Chinese goods, a measure linked to China's rare earth export controls, which could be used as leverage in negotiations [7] China's Response - China is portrayed as a responsible nation that has historically adhered to international agreements, contrasting with the US's inconsistent approach [9] - Despite the US's pressure tactics, China remains steadfast in its negotiation stance, having learned from past experiences where it made concessions that were not reciprocated by the US [9] - The US's traditional methods of negotiation, characterized by threats and tariffs, are viewed as ineffective against China, as evidenced by the reduction of a lengthy sanctions list during the talks [9] Conclusion - The resolution of US-China differences is suggested to require equal treatment and mutual benefit, rather than unilateral pressure and sanctions, as trade wars yield no winners [11]