Workflow
历史不容轻忽遗忘!民进党当局不办光复节纪念活动,“岛内人民无法接受”
Ren Min Wang·2025-10-27 06:11

Core Viewpoint - The 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery is marked by significant commemorative events in mainland China, contrasting with the lack of recognition from Taiwan's ruling party, leading to public reflection on historical narratives and political motivations [1][4][5]. Group 1: Commemorative Events - Mainland China held a grand ceremony on October 25 to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery, including a reception at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse, emphasizing the importance of this historical event [2][3]. - Attendees expressed that establishing Taiwan Recovery Day is timely and significant, with remarks highlighting the need to remember history and uphold historical truths [2][3]. - The event featured a display at the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War Memorial Hall, showcasing Taiwan's historical governance and its role in the national anti-Japanese struggle [3]. Group 2: Political Reactions in Taiwan - The Taiwanese leadership, particularly Lai Ching-te, did not acknowledge the anniversary, leading to criticism regarding selective historical narratives and a lack of respect for history [4][5]. - Opposition figures, including KMT leaders, emphasized the importance of recognizing the anti-Japanese struggle and the historical significance of Taiwan's recovery, arguing against the ruling party's narrative [4][5][6]. - Criticism was directed at the ruling party for avoiding the term "recovery," with calls for a more respectful acknowledgment of historical events and the sacrifices made during the anti-Japanese war [6][7]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Historical Reflection - Public sentiment in Taiwan reflects a desire to honor the historical significance of the recovery, with grassroots commemorative activities emerging despite the lack of official recognition [5][6]. - Commentary in Taiwanese media highlights the contrast between the mainland's commemorative approach and the ruling party's avoidance of historical acknowledgment, framing it as a betrayal of history [8]. - The discourse emphasizes the need for a collective memory that honors the sacrifices made for Taiwan's recovery and warns against the dangers of historical amnesia [7][8].