10月27日特讯！贝森特发布通告称：美国将不会对华加征100%关税，引国际舆论哗然

Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Department has publicly stated that it will no longer consider imposing a 100% tariff on Chinese goods, marking a significant strategic shift in the U.S.-China trade war [1][3] - The trade conflict has been characterized as a no-win situation, with U.S. inflation reaching critical levels and American households facing increased costs due to tariffs, leading to a reconsideration of aggressive trade policies ahead of the midterm elections [3][4] - Despite the tariffs, China's manufacturing sector has shown remarkable resilience, with exports not collapsing but instead moving up the value chain, indicating that alternative production capacities in Southeast Asia cannot meet global demand [4][6] Group 2 - The strategic pivot by the U.S. reveals inherent contradictions in its approach to China, as the desire to contain China comes with significant costs that the U.S. is unwilling to bear [7][8] - The concept of "decoupling" from China is deemed unrealistic, as U.S. companies recognize the unmatched scale and complete supply chain that China offers, with any forced separation likely leading to inflation and supply chain disruptions [8][9] - The geopolitical landscape, including conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, has stretched U.S. resources thin, necessitating a more conciliatory approach towards China [12] Group 3 - The shift in tariff strategy signifies a new phase in U.S.-China relations, transitioning from hard confrontation to a competitive yet cooperative dynamic [12][13] - While competition will continue in high-tech sectors such as advanced chips and biotechnology, there are renewed opportunities for collaboration in areas like climate change and financial stability [13][15] - China's ability to navigate pressures and maintain an open stance demonstrates its capacity to rise as a major power, suggesting that the era of unilateral dominance is waning [15][16]