特朗普反复横跳，美国上下一片混乱，都只是这个精明商人的生意？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities of Trump's approach to U.S. manufacturing and trade policies, highlighting the limitations of presidential power in influencing corporate decisions and the short-sightedness of capitalists in the American economic system [5][24]. Group 1: Trump's Trade Policies - Trump's tenure has been marked by a focus on bringing manufacturing back to the U.S., yet the reality shows limited success, with many companies opting for global procurement strategies [9][12]. - The article notes that despite Trump's efforts, the manufacturing sector remains heavily reliant on imports, particularly in low-profit areas like textiles and furniture [14][15]. Group 2: Manufacturing Return and Job Creation - In 2024, the U.S. is expected to add 244,000 manufacturing jobs through reshoring and foreign direct investment, with significant growth in the computer, electronics, and electrical equipment sectors [12]. - However, the anticipated job growth in high-tech sectors like semiconductors and clean energy faces challenges, including delays in project timelines and a shortage of skilled labor [12][15]. Group 3: Corporate Influence on Manufacturing - The article emphasizes that the decision to return manufacturing to the U.S. is ultimately driven by corporate interests rather than political will, as capitalists prioritize profit over nationalistic policies [17][24]. - Even with bipartisan support for reshoring, the actual outcomes are limited by the willingness of companies to invest domestically, as seen in the case of the historical Airmus factory, which was closed despite Trump's visit [9][11]. Group 4: Economic System and Short-sightedness - The American economic system is characterized by a capitalist structure that inherently promotes short-term thinking among business leaders, which affects their decisions regarding manufacturing and investment [23][24]. - Trump's dual role as a businessman and politician places him within this short-sighted framework, limiting his ability to enact long-term changes in manufacturing policy [24][25].