硅谷大佬带头弃用OpenAI、“倒戈”Kimi K2,直呼“太便宜了”,白宫首位AI主管也劝不住
3 6 Ke·2025-10-28 10:39

Core Insights - Silicon Valley is shifting from expensive closed-source models to cheaper open-source alternatives, driven by cost considerations and performance improvements [1][2][14] - The Kimi K2 model, developed by a Chinese startup, has gained traction due to its superior performance and significantly lower costs compared to models from OpenAI and Anthropic [1][5][14] - The introduction of the DeepSeek model, which offers a 50% reduction in API costs, is putting pressure on the U.S. AI industry to adapt [3][8] Cost Considerations - Chamath Palihapitiya highlighted that the decision to switch to open-source models is primarily based on cost, as existing systems like Anthropic's are too expensive [2][5] - The DeepSeek model charges $0.28 per million inputs and $0.42 per million outputs, while Anthropic's Claude model costs approximately $3.15 for similar services, making DeepSeek 10 to 35 times cheaper [3][8] Model Performance and Transition Challenges - Transitioning to new models like DeepSeek requires significant time for adjustments and fine-tuning, complicating the switch despite the cost benefits [2][6] - Companies are facing a dilemma on whether to switch to cheaper models or wait for existing models to catch up in performance [6][10] Open-Source vs. Closed-Source Dynamics - The current landscape shows that high-performance closed-source models are predominantly from the U.S., while high-performance open-source models are emerging from China [10][12] - The open-source movement is seen as a way to counterbalance the power of large tech companies, but the leading open-source models are currently from China [8][10] Security and Ownership Concerns - There are concerns regarding the ownership and potential security risks associated with using Chinese models, but deploying them on U.S. infrastructure mitigates some of these risks [12][16] - The competitive landscape encourages rigorous testing for vulnerabilities, which is seen as a positive development for model safety [16][17] Future Implications - The ongoing shift towards open-source models may lead to significant changes in the AI industry, particularly in terms of cost and energy consumption [5][10] - Companies are exploring solutions to manage rising energy costs associated with AI operations, indicating a need for sustainable practices in the industry [11][12]