突发特讯！特朗普含怒通告全球：“很长时间内”都不想与加拿大总理见面！罕见措辞引爆国际舆论

Core Viewpoint - The diplomatic crisis between the U.S. and Canada was ignited by a television advertisement from Ontario, which referenced former President Reagan's opposition to tariffs, challenging President Trump's authority and leading to escalating tensions [2][10]. Group 1: Trump's Strategy - Trump's response to the advertisement reflects his "maximum pressure" tactic, viewing international trade as a zero-sum game and using emotional outbursts to gain leverage in negotiations [3]. - The crisis was escalated through a series of threats, including halting trade negotiations and imposing tariffs, culminating in a refusal to meet with Canadian Prime Minister Carney at the APEC summit [4][5]. - Trump's approach signals a shift in U.S. foreign policy, where relationships are based on transactional dynamics rather than shared values, potentially destabilizing international relations [10][11]. Group 2: Canada's Response - Prime Minister Carney's calm and measured response contrasts sharply with Trump's aggressive stance, positioning Canada as a responsible partner willing to engage in dialogue [6][8]. - Carney indicated that Canada would continue to pursue economic development and diversify its international partnerships, reducing reliance on the U.S. [8]. - This strategic restraint by Canada reflects a long-term focus on national interests, aiming to navigate the asymmetric power dynamics with the U.S. [8][11]. Group 3: Implications for International Relations - The conflict highlights potential fractures in the traditionally close U.S.-Canada relationship, raising concerns among other U.S. allies about the future of transatlantic ties [10]. - The situation serves as a critical indicator of shifting international order, where even close allies can face significant rifts over seemingly minor issues [11].