居委会也可成为监护人，最高法发布老年人权益保护典型案例

Group 1 - The Supreme Court emphasizes the activation of the public guardianship system to ensure elderly individuals without other guardians can receive proper care [1][2] - In a typical case, the court appointed a neighborhood committee as the guardian for an elderly individual living alone, who was deemed to have limited civil capacity due to mental illness [1][2] - The court's decision aligns with the principle of "best interest of the ward," ensuring that the elderly individual remains in a familiar living environment while receiving necessary support for daily life and medical care [2] Group 2 - The court conducted a thorough investigation into the elderly individual's physical and mental condition, leading to the legal recognition of their limited civil capacity [2] - A collaborative supervision mechanism was established involving relevant departments to address the challenges faced by elderly individuals in accessing and managing their assets [2]