Huaxi Securities(SZ:002926) Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-10-30 07:40Market Overview - On October 30, 2025, the A-share market experienced fluctuations with a significant increase in trading volume, reaching a total of 2.46 trillion yuan [2] - The Securities ETF (159841) saw a slight decline, with a turnover rate of 5.4% and a total transaction volume of 556 million yuan [2] - Notably, the Securities ETF (159841) attracted capital inflows despite the market downturn, with a net subscription of 23.4 million shares by the end of the trading day [2] Fund Performance - As of October 29, 2025, the Securities ETF (159841) recorded a substantial growth of 4.591 billion yuan over the past three months [3] - In the last ten trading days, the Securities ETF (159841) accumulated a total capital inflow of 77.69 million yuan [3] - The fund is expected to maintain high activity levels in the capital market, benefiting from a significant increase in revenue and net profit in the securities industry during the third quarter [3] Company Earnings Reports - Huaxi Securities reported a third-quarter revenue of 1.42 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 73.42%, with a net profit of 547 million yuan, up 155.03% [4] - For the first three quarters, Huaxi Securities achieved a revenue of 3.493 billion yuan, reflecting a 56.52% year-on-year growth, and a net profit of 1.059 billion yuan, which is a 316.89% increase [4] - Shanxi Securities also released its third-quarter report, showing a revenue of 2.459 billion yuan for the first three quarters, a 13.53% increase, and a net profit of 732 million yuan, up 37.34% [4] Analyst Insights - Zhongyuan Securities suggests that if the brokerage sector approaches the lower end of the valuation fluctuation range in the short to medium term, it presents a good opportunity for re-investment in the brokerage sector [4] - Analysts recommend focusing on leading brokerage firms with strong wealth management capabilities and those with significant equity investment activities, especially those with valuations below the sector average [4]