彩虹星球胜诉背后的“职业打假”：从“野蛮生长”到逐步退潮

Core Viewpoint - The case of "Rainbow Planet vs. Wang Hai" marks a significant turning point in the legal regulation of professional counterfeiters, transitioning from public opinion battles to a more structured legal framework [2][5]. Group 1: Case Summary - The Xi'an Intermediate People's Court upheld the first-instance ruling, requiring Wang Hai to delete infringing content, publicly apologize, and compensate 97,800 yuan [2][4]. - The dispute, which began in October 2022, involved accusations from Wang Hai regarding the authenticity of Rainbow Planet's organic products, leading to reputational damage and a decline in performance for the company [2][3]. - The final ruling determined that Wang Hai's claims were unfounded, as investigations revealed no issues with Rainbow Planet's products [4]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The case exemplifies the evolving landscape of professional counterfeiters, highlighting the shift from individual rights protection to regulatory oversight [5]. - Recent data from the Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee indicated that the annual complaint volume from professional claimants reached 246,000, showcasing the scale and systematic nature of these practices [5]. - New regulations, such as the Consumer Rights Protection Law and the Supreme Court's judicial interpretations, aim to delineate the boundaries between legitimate consumer protection and malicious claims for profit [6].