美国法院发出禁制令，称停发食品福利将造成“不可挽回的伤害”

Core Points - A federal court has ordered the Trump administration to continue providing food stamp benefits to millions of Americans, preventing the White House from using the interruption of key social welfare as a political tool [1] - The ruling affects approximately 42 million people who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) [1] - The court instructed the Trump administration to utilize emergency funds reserved by Congress to maintain at least part of the SNAP benefits [1] Group 1 - Judge Jack McConnell's ruling blocked the planned cut-off of SNAP benefits, which was set to take effect the following day [1] - The lawsuit argued that cutting SNAP benefits was arbitrary and created a crisis for those dependent on food stamps [1] - Another federal judge, Indira Talwani, expressed similar views in a related case, indicating that the plaintiffs could likely prove the suspension of benefits was illegal [1] Group 2 - In response to judicial pressure, President Trump stated he has instructed his legal team to seek clarification on how to legally fund SNAP [2] - The Trump administration claims its actions are legally justified, arguing that the SNAP program is effectively non-existent due to Congress's failure to pass a funding bill [3] - The administration's lawyer, Tyler Becker, emphasized that the decision to use up to $6 billion in emergency reserves is at the discretion of the executive branch [3] Group 3 - The court's decision sparked strong reactions from both political parties, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer praising the ruling and criticizing Trump's decision to cut SNAP as retaliatory and cruel [5] - Schumer accused Trump of attempting to create a hunger crisis to avoid making concessions on healthcare issues [5] - Conversely, White House officials expressed strong dissatisfaction with the ruling, with National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett criticizing the decision and warning of potential risks to emergency funds [6][8]