信誉危机？世界上80多个国家，把黄金存在美国，为何现在要不回来

Core Insights - The article discusses the significance of gold reserves held by various countries, particularly in the context of the United States' role as a custodian of global gold reserves [1][3][4] - It highlights the historical context of why many countries store their gold in the U.S., tracing back to the Bretton Woods system and the post-World War II international landscape [3][4] - The growing distrust towards the U.S. regarding gold storage is emphasized, with examples of countries attempting to retrieve their gold reserves and facing obstacles [3][4] Group 1: Importance of Gold Reserves - Gold reserves are a measure of national strength, with the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank storing a significant portion of global gold [1] - International trade often utilizes gold as a settlement method, particularly within the U.S. [3] - The U.S. has historically held about two-thirds of the world's gold post-World War II, leading to a reliance on U.S. gold storage by other nations [3] Group 2: Trust Issues and Retrieval Attempts - Countries like Venezuela and Germany have faced challenges in retrieving their gold from U.S. custody, raising concerns about the safety and accessibility of their reserves [3][4] - Germany's experience in attempting to repatriate gold has led to speculation about the actual status of its gold reserves in the U.S. [3][4] - The article notes that over 80 countries store gold in the U.S. primarily due to trust, but recent actions by the U.S. may lead to a crisis of confidence among these nations [4] Group 3: Global Trends in Gold Storage - Nations such as Turkey, Russia, and Hungary are increasingly repatriating their gold reserves, indicating a shift in strategy to mitigate financial risks associated with currency depreciation [3][4] - China's gold reserve situation is discussed, with estimates suggesting it may hold around 600 tons in the U.S., although the necessity of this storage is debated [4] - The article suggests that if multiple countries demand their gold back simultaneously, it could lead to a significant crisis for the U.S. [4]