Group 1 - The meeting between the US and China in Busan was rated highly by Trump, who claimed it deserved a score of 12 out of 10, indicating a positive atmosphere despite underlying tensions [1][8] - Trump announced a 10% reduction in tariffs on Chinese goods, which is expected to restore tariffs to levels before the imposition of the "fentanyl tariffs" in early 2025, reflecting the economic pressures faced by the US [3][20] - The US and China reached a consensus on the current stalemate in the Russia-Ukraine war, suggesting a potential for cooperation on the issue, which counters the narrative of a complete US-China opposition on international matters [6][8] Group 2 - The absence of discussions on Taiwan during the meeting highlights the US's cautious approach to core interests, as any provocation could jeopardize bilateral cooperation [4][10] - Trump's planned visit to China in April marks a significant step towards normalizing high-level dialogues between the two nations, indicating a potential thaw in relations [4][25] - The meeting revealed a shift in the US's strategic priorities, as it chose not to confront China over Taiwan, recognizing the risks involved amid domestic economic pressures [10][12] Group 3 - The US's recent actions, such as approving South Korea's nuclear submarine construction and the potential resumption of nuclear tests, reflect a strategy of pressure before negotiation, indicating ongoing tensions in the region [16][18] - The 10% tariff reduction, while seemingly minor, signals a gradual erosion of US dominance in trade negotiations, as China has maintained its core interests without significant concessions [20][22] - The current state of US-China relations suggests a new phase of "equal strength" in their negotiations, with China successfully navigating US pressures through market diversification and innovation [24][25]
美国让步!中美会谈结束,特朗普抛4大消息,赖清德“倚美”梦碎
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-11-01 07:47