TIAN AN(HK:00028) Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-11-01 15:40Group 1 - The core discussion between the US and China lasted approximately 1 hour and 40 minutes, drawing significant media attention, with Trump surprising many by proposing the G2 concept and expressing intentions to visit China within the year [1] - The US agreed to withdraw tariffs on Chinese fentanyl-related products and suspend tariffs on electronic components and machinery, indicating some progress in trade discussions [2][5] - Both sides have adjusted their retaliatory measures on agricultural and energy products, agreeing to extend certain tariff exemptions to provide businesses with more adaptation time [5] Group 2 - The G2 concept, while appearing to promote joint governance, is seen as a way for the US to maintain its dominant position while involving China, reflecting a desire to share the burden without relinquishing power [7][10] - China has shown disinterest in the G2 proposal, emphasizing that international affairs should involve all countries rather than a select few, aligning with its stance on promoting a more equitable global order [10][15] - The US's internal political dynamics reveal opposition to the G2 concept, with some arguing it undermines America's leadership role and could lead to a diminished influence in global affairs [12][14] Group 3 - The G2 proposal is perceived as a trap for China, where the US would retain control while expecting China to bear the consequences of any failures, which China rejects [17] - China's rising global influence and economic resilience are highlighted, with a focus on its ability to counter US strategies and maintain its position in international relations [19] - The ongoing shift towards a multipolar world order is noted, with more countries seeking to assert their voices in global governance, challenging the traditional dominance of a few nations [21][23]