又被小米投诉了！远离雷军，保命要紧

Core Viewpoint - The incident highlights a troubling trend where a major company resorts to complaints instead of engaging in constructive dialogue or providing evidence to counter criticism [1][10][14] Group 1: Company Actions - Xiaomi filed a complaint against a self-media article for "defaming its reputation," but the complaint lacked specific evidence or claims of actual damage [1][8] - The complaint was characterized as an attempt to suppress dissent rather than a legitimate legal action, with no clear legal basis or format [8][10] - Xiaomi's approach reflects a pattern of prioritizing image management over addressing valid criticisms, indicating a reliance on complaints to control public perception [10][12] Group 2: Public Response - The self-media individual responded to Xiaomi's complaint by emphasizing the importance of factual and legal foundations for any claims, criticizing the company's tactics as an abuse of complaint rights [12][14] - The public sentiment suggests that consumers expect companies to engage with criticism constructively rather than resorting to legal threats [12][14] - The incident serves as a reminder that in a legal society, no entity is above scrutiny, and companies should focus on improving their products and communication rather than silencing critics [14]