XIAOMI(HK:01810) Xin Lang Cai Jing·2025-11-02 00:28Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a Xinjiang woman selling sweet potatoes in a style reminiscent of Xiaomi's CEO Lei Jun highlights the tension between grassroots creativity and corporate legal actions, raising questions about the limits of parody and expression in contemporary society [1][5][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A Xinjiang woman humorously mimicked Lei Jun's product launch style to promote her sweet potatoes, leading to a complaint from Xiaomi to remove the video [1]. - Despite the complaint, the video gained popularity, with netizens humorously declaring that "the internet won" [3]. Group 2: Cultural Commentary - The situation reflects a broader issue regarding whether ordinary people can freely express themselves without facing legal repercussions [5]. - Mimicry is presented as a fundamental form of expression in modern culture, with various public figures and celebrities being parodied in different media [6][8]. Group 3: Legal and Brand Implications - The complaint from Xiaomi is viewed as an overreach, as the woman did not use Xiaomi's logo or misrepresent her product, and her actions did not harm the brand's sales [10][12]. - The case is compared to similar instances in other countries where parody and mimicry have been protected under freedom of expression, suggesting that Xiaomi's legal approach may backfire [12][15]. Group 4: Public Reaction and Brand Image - The public's laughter and support for the woman signify a collective defense of humor and creativity against corporate legalism [12][17]. - The article argues that great brands should embrace imitation as a sign of cultural relevance rather than react defensively [15][16].