Core Viewpoint - The recent legal actions against Dingyifeng and its associates highlight significant allegations of securities manipulation and illegal fundraising activities, particularly involving Global Smart Holdings Limited, which has raised concerns in the investment community [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has obtained a temporary injunction from the Hong Kong High Court against 12 individuals suspected of manipulating shares of Global Smart Holdings Limited, prohibiting them from transferring or disposing of assets in Hong Kong valued at a total of HKD 82.4 million [1]. - The SFC's legal proceedings are part of a broader investigation into Dingyifeng Holdings Group International Limited and its former chairman, Sui Guangyi, along with 28 other suspects for alleged stock manipulation during a specific period [1][2]. - The SFC's actions aim to ensure that sufficient assets are available to fulfill any potential restitution orders if the court finds the defendants in violation of relevant securities laws [1]. Group 2: Investment Scheme and Market Manipulation - Dingyifeng and its associated companies have been accused of issuing fraudulent financial products and engaging in illegal activities, including the promotion of "DDO digital options," which are categorized as "air coins" [2]. - Between October 31, 2018, and March 11, 2019, Sui and other suspects allegedly manipulated trading in Global Smart Holdings, artificially inflating its stock price and trading volume, which misled investors about the stock's performance [2]. - Global Smart Holdings' stock price experienced a dramatic increase of over 700% within two months, followed by a rapid decline, indicating characteristics typical of market manipulation [2]. Group 3: Asset Recovery and Investor Compensation - The temporary injunction serves as a starting point for asset preservation, but actual compensation for affected investors faces several hurdles, including the need for a final judgment and proof of direct correlation between the defendants' assets and illegal gains [4][5]. - Investors may need to pursue civil litigation to recover losses, requiring substantial evidence to establish a direct causal link between their losses and the defendants' actions [5]. - The effectiveness of asset recovery is contingent upon various factors, including the actual value of frozen assets and the presence of other creditors [5]. Group 4: Regulatory Insights and Company Status - Regulatory experts suggest that current licensing regulations may be inadequate, as Dingyifeng has utilized complex structures to obscure fundraising activities, highlighting a need for improved monitoring of abnormal financial transactions [6]. - Dingyifeng Holdings Group International Limited has rebranded as Jiawen Century Investment Limited, which remains listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange but is currently suspended from trading [6]. - The company reported a loss of approximately HKD 10.5 million in the first half of 2025, with its revenue primarily derived from interest and dividends totaling only HKD 200,000 [6].
鼎益丰“玄学投资”骗局崩塌!香港证监会再出重拳冻结8240万港元资产
Hua Xia Shi Bao·2025-11-02 00:52