Workflow
日元跌至8个月低点,日本要干预了?新财长警告:正以高度紧迫感密切关注
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen·2025-11-02 03:46

Core Viewpoint - The Japanese government is increasingly concerned about the depreciation of the yen, with the new Finance Minister, Katsuyuki Kitayama, indicating a heightened urgency in monitoring the currency's exchange rate, suggesting a potential for direct intervention in the foreign exchange market [1][4]. Group 1: Government's Stance - Katsuyuki Kitayama expressed that the government is closely watching the foreign exchange market due to "one-sided and rapid currency fluctuations," emphasizing the influence of speculative behavior on excessive volatility [2][4]. - Following a significant drop in the yen's value, which reached a low of 154.17 against the dollar, Kitayama's warning led to a slight recovery of the yen to 153.65 [2][4]. Group 2: Market Reactions and Analysis - The language used by Kitayama is more assertive compared to her predecessor, indicating an increased level of concern from the government regarding the yen's depreciation [4]. - Analysts from Nomura Securities suggest that the market may interpret the government's concerns about exchange rate fluctuations as not particularly strong, given Kitayama's support for the current monetary policy [4][5]. Group 3: Conditions for Intervention - Several indicators suggest that conditions for foreign exchange intervention may be forming, with the speed and level of the yen's depreciation being critical factors [5][8]. - Historical context shows that the Japanese authorities intervened in the market when the yen depreciated approximately 14% to 155 in October 2022 and 8% to over 160 in May 2024, indicating that the current decline of about 5% in the past month is significant enough to raise concerns [8]. Group 4: Historical Context and Limitations - Historical interventions by Japan have shown limited long-term effectiveness, as past actions did not fully halt the yen's depreciation trend, with external financial shocks often driving market behavior [9][12]. - The lessons from history indicate that while intervention may yield short-term results, it is challenging to reverse long-term trends driven by fundamental factors such as interest rate differentials [12].