Group 1 - The recent China-US talks resulted in a win-win situation, with China securing tariff reductions and the suspension of sanctions, while the US benefited from relaxed export controls on rare earths [1] - Japan and South Korea, in their efforts to align with the US, incurred significant costs, with Japan paying over $500 billion and South Korea investing $350 billion, yet they ended up with less favorable terms compared to China [1][3] - The EU's previous attempts to negotiate with China and impose tariffs on electric vehicles have backfired, as they now find themselves in a precarious position with limited leverage against China [5][7] Group 2 - The EU is now facing pressure to reassess its strategy, as Germany's energy supply issues hinder its ability to compete in high-tech industries, particularly in AI [7][8] - The US aims to de-industrialize the EU and bind it to its energy strategy, which has led to trade tensions and high tariffs on EU products, indicating that US interests take precedence over those of its allies [8] - The EU's current dilemma is whether to continue following the US or to seek pragmatic cooperation with China, as indecision could lead to further marginalization in the global trade landscape [9]
中美达成共识,德国最先坐不住,一个180度大转弯让各方目瞪口呆
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-11-02 07:06