中美一达成共识，德国最先坐不住，180度大转弯让各方目瞪口呆

Group 1 - The meeting in Busan reflects subtle changes in the global power dynamics, impacting not only China and the US but also eliciting varied reactions from other countries [1] - For China, the dialogue is seen as a strategic breakthrough, alleviating tariff pressures in key areas and postponing certain sanctions [1] - The US has expressed concerns regarding the rare earth supply chain, but some consensus has been reached, addressing US strategic interests [1] Group 2 - European countries are feeling geopolitical pressure as they realize their passive position in global political and economic competition [4] - German Chancellor's statement highlights concerns over technology dominance being monopolized by the US and China, indicating a fear of European marginalization [4] Group 3 - The Busan meeting was marked by dramatic diplomatic shifts, with the US initially signaling strong punitive tariffs on Chinese goods, only to later indicate a potential easing of pressure [6] - Trump's unexpected praise for China post-meeting, rating the talks highly, surprised many Western media outlets [8] Group 4 - As US-China relations shift from confrontation to cooperation, European allies express anxiety over the potential for increased US pressure on Europe [9] - The EU has been attempting to maintain a balanced strategy between the US and China, but risks being sidelined as both powers may dominate global supply chains and technology standards [9] Group 5 - China has effectively countered US pressure, achieving significant concessions, including the postponement of tariffs and a reduction in proposed tariffs on certain goods [11] - The strategic leverage China holds in rare earth resources and its suspension of soybean imports from the US have had significant impacts on US agriculture [12][14] Group 6 - The internal political pressure in the US has increased as farmers suffer losses due to trade policies, leading to a shift in Trump's approach to negotiations with China [15][17] - The meeting showcased China's ability to leverage its unique resource advantages and effectively counter US strategies [20] Group 7 - The dialogue indicates that China is no longer a passive participant in international rules but is now a key player in shaping them [21] - The EU's failure to unite with China against US unilateralism serves as a warning, as it faces multiple challenges including energy shortages and manufacturing relocations [23] Group 8 - The EU must recognize that reliance on "choosing sides" or "financial buyouts" for stability is fragile, emphasizing the need to build core competitive advantages [25]