新加坡部长谈贸易摩擦，无视美国主动打压，却一味劝中国忍让！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the need for China to adopt a more cooperative approach in trade relations, particularly with the United States, while highlighting the complexities and underlying issues of the current trade tensions [1][2]. Group 1: Trade Relations and Cooperation - Singapore's Minister Vivian Balakrishnan suggests that China should learn to "tolerate" trade friction and avoid a tit-for-tat approach, advocating for building bridges and seeking cooperation to mitigate protectionism [1][2]. - The article emphasizes that the trade imbalance is not initiated by China but is a result of systematic containment strategies from the U.S., including tariffs and technology restrictions [1][2]. Group 2: Singapore's Position and Concerns - Singapore, heavily reliant on global trade, is concerned about international order instability and has benefited from maintaining a balance between China and the U.S. [4]. - The article points out that Singapore's attempts to act as a mediator often lean towards Western perspectives, raising questions about the impartiality of its stance [5]. Group 3: Divergent Views on Multilateralism - There is a fundamental difference in the understanding of multilateralism between Singapore and China, with Singapore favoring actions within a U.S.-defined framework, while China advocates for equality and mutual benefit among nations [7]. - The article notes that Singapore fears a "leadership vacuum" in global order, whereas China views multipolarity as an inevitable trend in global development [7]. Group 4: China's Stance and Principles - China maintains that its development path is self-determined and emphasizes two non-negotiable principles: the right to develop independently and the defense of core interests [8][12]. - The article argues that promoting cooperation should involve addressing the actions of the party that disrupts dialogue, rather than placing the burden solely on China to concede [10]. Group 5: Conclusion on International Relations - The article concludes that the world requires mutual respect and equal dialogue rather than unilateral concessions, suggesting that a balanced international order will emerge when each country focuses on its responsibilities [16].