全世界静待美国最高法怎么判，特朗普又改口说“不去了”

Core Points - The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear a significant case regarding the legality of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, with a hearing scheduled for November 5 [1][5][6] - Trump has stated that this case could be one of the most important in U.S. history, arguing that a ruling against him could leave the country vulnerable in global competition [3][5] - The outcome of the case could have substantial implications for U.S. businesses, particularly those affected by tariffs, with estimates suggesting that companies have already paid around $90 billion in tariffs [15][19] Group 1: Legal Context - The case revolves around the interpretation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which the Trump administration used to impose tariffs on a wide range of goods [4][11] - A previous ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals determined that the Act does not grant the president the authority to impose such extensive tariffs [4][11] - The Supreme Court's decision will address the broader question of presidential powers and the limits of executive authority in trade matters [9][10][17] Group 2: Business Impact - Companies like Learning Resources have reported significant financial losses due to tariffs, with estimates of $14 million in losses attributed to Trump's tariffs [7] - Many businesses are preparing for the possibility that tariffs will remain in place, even if they hope for a ruling against their legality [9][19] - The uncertainty surrounding the tariffs has led to operational challenges for companies, including increased costs and the need to adjust supply chains [19][20] Group 3: Political Reactions - Some Republican senators have expressed concerns that Trump's attendance at the Supreme Court hearing could be perceived as an attempt to pressure the justices [4] - Democratic lawmakers have also criticized the potential for presidential influence over the court, arguing that the president should not attend the hearing [4][11] - The Senate recently passed a resolution to terminate Trump's global tariff policy, although its future in the House remains uncertain [12][11]