美英围剿太子集团，新加坡家办再卷入“洗钱风暴”

Core Insights - The joint legal action by the US and UK against Chen Zhi, chairman of the Prince Group, exposes a significant cross-border money laundering network in Southeast Asia, highlighting vulnerabilities in Singapore's financial system [1][2][16]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - On October 14, 2025, the US and UK jointly filed charges against Chen Zhi for leading a large-scale cross-border investment scam and money laundering operation, marking the most extensive coordinated action against Southeast Asian cybercrime to date [2][16]. - The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the Prince Group and 146 related individuals and entities, while the New York Eastern District Attorney charged Chen with conspiracy to commit telecommunications fraud and money laundering [2][16]. - The case revealed that the Prince Group, which ostensibly operates in real estate, banking, and hospitality, is actually involved in human trafficking and forced labor within scam operations described as "prison-like" environments [2][4]. Group 2: Chen Zhi's Background and Operations - Chen Zhi, born in 1987 in Fujian, China, acquired Cambodian citizenship through a $250,000 donation and has since built the Prince Group into one of Cambodia's most influential private enterprises, expanding into various sectors [4][16]. - He faces five charges, including forced labor, human trafficking, bribery, corporate money laundering, and international asset concealment, with potential penalties of up to 40 years in prison if convicted [4][16]. Group 3: DW Capital and Money Laundering Mechanisms - DW Capital, established by Chen in Singapore, has been identified as a central hub for laundering operations, utilizing family office structures and shell companies to create a facade of legitimacy [5][20]. - The firm claimed to manage over 60 million SGD and enjoyed tax incentives, but it has been reported that it does not hold the necessary capital markets services license, raising questions about its compliance [5][20]. - Chen's team reportedly established over ten management and holding companies in Singapore, with many registered at the same address, facilitating money laundering activities [6][20]. Group 4: Regulatory Implications and Responses - The case has prompted Singaporean authorities to investigate DW Capital and related entities, with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) indicating that local banks had flagged suspicious transactions as early as 2024 [16][20]. - Following the sanctions, Singapore's police issued a disposal prohibition order against Chen's network, seizing approximately 150 million SGD in assets [16][20]. - The incident has raised concerns about Singapore's reputation as a financial hub, with calls for a reassessment of its regulatory framework to prevent misuse by cross-border criminal organizations [21][24]. Group 5: Future Regulatory Landscape - The Prince Group case serves as a stress test for Singapore's financial system, highlighting the need for a balance between attracting legitimate capital and preventing illicit financial flows [21][24]. - In response to the growing scrutiny, Singapore has begun tightening regulations, including the introduction of a family office regulatory framework and enhanced anti-money laundering measures [21][24]. - The ongoing situation emphasizes the importance of maintaining integrity and transparency in financial operations, as Singapore seeks to uphold its status as a trusted wealth management center [24].