荷兰切断中国安世晶圆供应，德国也变脸了，180度转向令各方错愕

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around Europe's sudden shift in policy towards Chinese companies, particularly in the semiconductor and telecommunications sectors, following a meeting between US and Chinese leaders [1][17][19] - The Netherlands' decision to take control of ASML and halt its wafer supply to China is seen as a politically motivated move rather than a purely commercial one, raising questions about the legitimacy of the legal basis for such actions [4][8][10] - Germany's plan to replace all Chinese 5G equipment within two years is a significant escalation, reflecting a departure from its historically pragmatic approach to economic decisions [10][12][15] Group 2 - The Netherlands' actions are perceived as reckless and lacking substantial evidence of security risks, as ASML primarily serves non-sensitive industries like automotive and home appliances [6][8] - Germany's abrupt decision to replace Chinese equipment is driven by external pressures, despite the potential high costs and disruptions to the telecommunications infrastructure [12][14][15] - The shift in European policy is linked to growing concerns over China's rising influence in high-tech sectors and the potential loss of control over critical supply chains [19][21] Group 3 - In response to Europe's actions, China emphasizes its commitment to independent technological development and strengthening its semiconductor capabilities [21][22][24] - China's strategy includes fostering domestic "little giant" companies and expanding international cooperation, particularly through initiatives like the Belt and Road [22][24] - The ongoing tension presents Europe with a strategic choice between pursuing open cooperation or adopting a more isolationist stance under the guise of security [25][27][29]