驻教育部纪检监察组与部党组同向发力同题共答推动形成层层抓落实工作格局

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the critical role of higher education institutions in China's anti-corruption efforts, particularly in the context of graduate admissions, highlighting the need for stringent oversight and systemic reforms to ensure fairness and integrity in the admissions process [2][3][4]. Group 1: Anti-Corruption Measures - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) has identified universities as key areas for systemic corruption risk and has initiated comprehensive reforms to address these issues [2][3]. - The CCDI's fourth plenary session called for a sustained high-pressure stance against corruption, focusing on key problems and areas within the education sector [2][3]. Group 2: Graduate Admissions Oversight - The China University of Science and Technology has established a collaborative mechanism for admissions supervision, covering the entire process from exam preparation to candidate selection, ensuring comprehensive oversight [3][4]. - The Ministry of Education has introduced the "2026 National Master's Graduate Admissions Management Regulations," which emphasizes the responsibility of admissions units and aims to create a robust regulatory framework [5][6]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework Enhancements - The new regulations include detailed processes for managing admissions, such as standardizing the reporting and review of qualification for additional points and defining the weight of preliminary exam scores [5]. - The regulations also introduce a conflict of interest avoidance system, specifying the circumstances under which personnel involved in admissions must recuse themselves, thereby reducing the influence of personal relationships on the admissions process [5][6]. Group 4: Continuous Monitoring and Improvement - The CCDI has committed to ongoing supervision of the Ministry of Education's efforts in managing admissions, ensuring that any issues are promptly addressed and rectified [6]. - The Ministry is focused on enhancing its institutional mechanisms and reforming its processes to effectively tackle identified problems and improve the overall admissions landscape [4][6].