三堂会审丨国企人员违反工作纪律及滥用职权相关问题分析

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Zhao, a former executive of a state-owned enterprise, who is implicated in multiple violations of party discipline and criminal offenses, including abuse of power and bribery, leading to significant financial losses for the company [1][4]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - Zhao served as the Party Secretary and Chairman of a state-owned materials company and later as Chairman of a state-controlled company. He was expelled from the Party in 2017 for serious violations of work discipline [2][3]. - Zhao engaged in risky commodity trading without real asset transfers, resulting in substantial losses for the company due to the failure of trading partners [2][3]. Bribery and Abuse of Power - From 2005 to 2017, Zhao accepted bribes totaling over 21.91 million RMB while in office and after leaving, leveraging his position to benefit certain individuals and companies [3][12]. - Zhao personally guaranteed loans for a private metallurgy company without proper authorization, leading to a court ruling that imposed a liability of over 56.03 million RMB on his company [3][10]. Investigation and Legal Proceedings - In August 2023, Zhao was investigated for suspected job-related crimes, leading to formal charges in July 2024 and a public prosecution in March 2025 [4][5]. - On June 20, 2025, Zhao was sentenced to 11 years and 6 months in prison for his crimes, including a fine of 2 million RMB [4][5]. Application of Disciplinary Regulations - The article emphasizes the importance of accurately applying disciplinary regulations to clarify the boundaries between violations of party discipline and criminal acts, particularly in cases involving state-owned enterprise personnel [6][7]. - Zhao's actions were deemed to violate work discipline as he knowingly engaged in high-risk transactions that led to significant losses, warranting disciplinary action under the Party's regulations [8][9]. Financial Misconduct and Consequences - Zhao's unauthorized guarantees for loans and his involvement in risky trading practices resulted in severe financial repercussions for the state-owned enterprise, highlighting the need for stringent oversight and accountability in state-owned companies [10][11]. - The case illustrates the legal framework surrounding the abuse of power in state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the consequences of such actions on national interests [10][11].