中德能源对决炸场！钍堆狂飙2兆瓦VS德国核爆自废武功

Group 1 - The core of the article highlights the contrasting energy strategies of China and Germany, with China advancing its thorium molten salt reactor technology while Germany dismantles its nuclear power infrastructure [1][4][10] - China's thorium molten salt reactor, TMSR-LF1, operates at a stable power of 2 megawatts and utilizes liquid molten salt as both coolant and fuel carrier, achieving high operational temperatures of up to 700°C [3][6] - China possesses 30% of the world's thorium reserves, exceeding 1 million tons, which is projected to meet energy demands for thousands of years, showcasing a significant advantage over its limited uranium resources [3][6] Group 2 - Germany's decision to decommission the Gundremmingen nuclear power plant, which previously supplied 5% of the nation's electricity, is framed as a consequence of populism and public fear surrounding nuclear energy [4][6] - Following the nuclear phase-out, Germany saw an increase in coal power generation from 35% to 46%, leading to a rise in carbon emissions, contradicting the environmental goals of the energy transition [4][6] - The cost of electricity in Germany rose from €0.3 to €0.5 per kilowatt-hour post-phase-out, negatively impacting industrial competitiveness, while China's thorium reactor approaches a cost of approximately ¥0.2 per kilowatt-hour [6][7] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that China's strategic approach to thorium molten salt technology is a culmination of 50 years of research, contrasting with Germany's retreat from nuclear energy driven by populist sentiments [6][7] - The thorium molten salt reactor produces nuclear waste with a half-life of only 300 years, significantly shorter than the millennia-long waste from uranium reactors, presenting a safer alternative [6][7] - The global nuclear energy landscape is shifting, with countries like the US and Japan also reviving nuclear projects, while China explores innovative applications of nuclear energy beyond traditional uses [7][10]