中美新一轮斗争又开始了，贝森特亮关税大刀，美国变脸速度惊到网友

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contradictory actions of the U.S. government regarding its relationship with China, particularly in the context of trade and rare earth materials, highlighting the underlying tensions and strategic maneuvers involved in this geopolitical landscape [1][3][31]. Group 1: U.S.-China Relations - U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra's threats towards China come shortly after President Trump praised the outcomes of U.S.-China talks, indicating a dissonance in U.S. diplomatic strategy [1][3]. - Following China's announcement to suspend rare earth export restrictions for a year, the U.S. reduced tariffs on Chinese goods by 10%, while simultaneously pressuring China to help curb fentanyl trafficking [3][5]. - The U.S. aims to benefit economically from China while attempting to mitigate risks, revealing a desire for continued cooperation without conceding power [5][11]. Group 2: Rare Earth Materials - China holds a dominant position in the global rare earth market, processing 90% of the world's rare earth materials, making it nearly impossible for the U.S. to eliminate its dependency on Chinese resources [11][13]. - The U.S. faces significant challenges in establishing its own rare earth processing capabilities, which could take five to seven years and require overcoming numerous Chinese patents [13][19]. - The article emphasizes that the competition over rare earth materials is fundamentally about material science and technology, with the U.S. needing to catch up to China's advancements [11][13]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and National Unity - The article highlights a strong sense of national unity among the Chinese populace, which is seen as a critical factor in China's strategic positioning against U.S. pressures [15][25]. - The collective awareness and support from ordinary citizens are portrayed as a powerful force in the ongoing geopolitical struggle, shifting the dynamics of traditional state-to-state conflict [21][25]. - The narrative suggests that the true strength of a nation lies not only in its military or economic power but also in the cohesion and resolve of its people [27][29]. Group 4: Future Implications - The article posits that the U.S.'s reliance on outdated tactics reflects its declining global dominance, while China is positioned to leverage its technological and resource advantages for future growth [31][34]. - It argues that the future will favor those who can master core technologies and unite public sentiment, with China already demonstrating significant resilience and strategic foresight [43].