美国拿不到稀土又破防，硬拉欧盟对华加税？这次中国一招制胜

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contradictory stance of the U.S. regarding tariffs on China, particularly in the context of rare earth elements, highlighting the U.S.'s heavy reliance on Chinese supplies while threatening to impose additional tariffs [1][5]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policy and Rare Earth Dependency - The U.S. is heavily dependent on China for rare earth elements, with 83.7% of its supply coming from China, particularly in heavy rare earths, which are almost entirely imported [5]. - Despite a recent trade truce where the U.S. agreed to cancel 91% of tariffs on China, the U.S. is threatening to raise tariffs again due to China's control over rare earth resources, which could lead to a detrimental cycle of retaliation [5][7]. - The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that continued tariffs could cost American businesses an additional $42 billion annually, impacting consumers and producers alike [5]. Group 2: International Reactions and Market Dynamics - While the U.S. calls for a "tariff alliance" against China, many allies are opening their markets to China, with the EU canceling punitive tariffs and Australia committing to zero tariffs on dairy and wine products [7][8]. - Japan has also implemented zero tariffs on 86% of goods from China under the RCEP framework, benefiting from reduced prices on popular products [8][10]. - The article emphasizes that in the context of globalization, trade benefits are prioritized over political posturing, as companies recognize the necessity of engaging with the Chinese market [10][11]. Group 3: The Future of Trade Relations - The U.S.'s inconsistent tariff policies are portrayed as a political performance, but the ultimate determinant of trade relations will be market forces [11]. - The article concludes that the essence of international relations is not zero-sum competition but rather opportunities for mutual growth and wealth creation [11].