Group 1 - The article draws a parallel between the current situation in Europe and the historical context of the Qing Dynasty, suggesting that Europe has lost its autonomy and is heavily reliant on the United States for military and economic matters [1][3] - The initial decision by Europe to rely on the U.S. for defense and economic growth has led to a loss of independent decision-making power, with significant industries now dominated by American companies [5][7] - The trade agreement signed between the U.S. and the EU highlights Europe's economic vulnerabilities, as it requires the EU to purchase significant amounts of American energy and military equipment while imposing tariffs on EU goods [8][10] Group 2 - The internal discord within the EU regarding the trade agreement reflects the differing priorities of member states, with some seeking to maintain dignity while others prioritize economic relations with the U.S. [10][12] - Proposed solutions for Europe's challenges, such as opposing the U.S., finding new trade partners, and strengthening the internal market, face significant obstacles due to economic stagnation and political fragmentation [13][15] - The decline in the industrial share of GDP in the EU, from nearly 30% in 1990 to an expected 22% by 2025, indicates a worrying trend of deindustrialization and reliance on the service sector [19]
签7500亿能源协议:依附美国30年,欧洲的“百年屈辱”刚刚开始?
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-11-07 12:38