“青云租”爆雷员工揭内幕：每个员工每月需投资30台手机，11万台集中流向两个村庄 丨封面头条

Core Viewpoint - The mobile rental platform "Qingyun Rent" is suspected of a major financial collapse, leading to significant investor losses and employee layoffs, with allegations of fabricated performance metrics [1][3][5]. Group 1: Company Operations - "Qingyun Rent" was promoted as a leading mobile rental platform, claiming a robust business model that involved attracting investments to purchase mobile phones for rental, with annual returns up to 16.8% [3][5]. - The company had previously boasted a network of 300 stores across various cities, supported by claims of backing from state-owned enterprises and insurance guarantees [3][5]. - Reports indicate that over 110,000 mobile phones were supposedly rented out, with a significant number of these phones allegedly concentrated in two villages in Henan province, raising suspicions about the legitimacy of the business operations [1][12]. Group 2: Employee Experiences - Employees were reportedly pressured to invest in mobile phones, with some taking loans or mortgaging properties to meet performance targets, leading to substantial financial losses [1][9]. - Many employees expressed doubts about the company's operations, noting that they were primarily focused on recruiting new investors rather than expanding the rental market [11][12]. - A significant portion of the phones in circulation was found to be linked to employee investments, suggesting a potential Ponzi scheme structure where returns were paid using new investors' funds [12][13]. Group 3: Investor Concerns - Investors began to report difficulties in withdrawing funds starting in mid-September, with many alleging unpaid salaries and unfulfilled promises from the company [5][6]. - The company's claims of financial stability were contradicted by the eventual closure of its operations, leading to widespread investor outrage and calls for legal action [1][5]. - Investigations revealed that many of the supposed rental transactions were likely fabricated, with evidence suggesting that the company may have engaged in fraudulent practices [12][13].