一个“猫步”引发的一场自证：小鹏机器人何以这样走？

Core Viewpoint - The public demonstration of the robot IRON by Xiaopeng Motors has sparked significant interest and controversy, leading to a dramatic moment where the robot's leg covering was cut open to prove it is not human, highlighting the emotional and technical challenges faced by the development team [5][10][19]. Group 1: Robot Development and Public Perception - The internal team at Xiaopeng Motors expressed mixed feelings about the need to demonstrate the robot's authenticity, feeling both proud of their technological achievements and saddened by the public's skepticism [3][6]. - The robot IRON, standing 178 cm tall and weighing 70 kg, was designed to mimic human movements closely, which led to public speculation about whether it contained a real person inside [4][19]. - The decision to cut open the robot was made after intense internal debate, with concerns about intellectual property and emotional attachment to the project [7][6]. Group 2: Technical Innovations and Features - The robot's design includes a unique skeletal and muscular structure that allows for highly natural movements, which is a significant advancement in the field of robotics [12][20]. - The implementation of a human-like spine and muscle system has contributed to the robot's fluid walking style, which has been described as breaking the traditional perception of robotic movement [12][19]. - Xiaopeng Motors has integrated advanced algorithms and high-performance AI chips to enhance the robot's motion control, achieving a level of fluidity and coordination previously unseen in humanoid robots [20][22]. Group 3: Market Strategy and Future Plans - Xiaopeng Motors aims to leverage the humanoid robot market, which is projected to be worth $20 trillion, as a new growth avenue alongside its automotive business [31][30]. - The company plans to establish partnerships and open the robot's SDK to developers, fostering an ecosystem for humanoid robot applications [32]. - The production of the humanoid robot is expected to face challenges, particularly in developing a reliable and durable "dexterous hand," which is crucial for its functionality [35][34].