伦敦磋商激烈进行！美国警告各国：不让步就取消家人签证，合理吗

Core Viewpoint - The recent IMO green shipping discussions in London have turned into a diplomatic spectacle, with the U.S. employing aggressive tactics to oppose a carbon tax proposal, leading to significant international tensions [1][4][21] Group 1: U.S. Diplomatic Tactics - The U.S. has reportedly threatened not only the representatives opposing the carbon tax but also their families, including potential visa revocations, showcasing a shocking level of intimidation [1][4][7] - U.S. officials have engaged in direct pressure tactics, including phone calls to over twenty countries, indicating a shift from traditional diplomacy to coercive measures [6][10] - The U.S. has implemented a multi-layered pressure strategy, starting with economic threats such as increased tariffs and port fees, targeting nations reliant on international trade [6][10] Group 2: Global Reactions - Some countries, particularly those with weaker economies, have chosen to compromise under U.S. pressure, delaying the carbon tax proposal [17] - Key EU members like Greece and Cyprus have shifted their stance due to fears of economic repercussions, revealing vulnerabilities in alliances [17] - In contrast, nations like Vanuatu and Panama have publicly denounced U.S. tactics, with officials expressing their commitment to national sovereignty and dignity [19][21] Group 3: Implications for International Relations - The U.S. has achieved a temporary tactical victory by delaying the carbon tax, but this has positioned it as a disruptor of international norms, undermining its global standing [21] - The use of personal threats, such as visa revocations, has been likened to organized crime tactics, damaging trust in international relations [21] - The situation reflects a broader trend of the U.S. resorting to coercive diplomacy as a response to declining influence, raising concerns about the future of multilateral cooperation [21]